• Users Online: 225
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 261-265

Metallic biliary stenting versus surgery for palliation of inoperable distal malignant obstructive jaundice


Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Muhammad Ramadan
Sanhur, Damanhur, Al-Buhaira, 22742
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_27_20

Rights and Permissions

Background Pancreatic and biliary malignancies are rarely operable. The role of intervention is to palliate jaundice. Biliary drainage can be done by surgical bypass or biliary stenting either percutaneously or by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Plastic and expandable metal stents (EMS) are available. Aim To compare metallic biliary stenting versus surgery for palliation of inoperable malignant obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatobiliary cancer. Patients and methods This retrospective, cohort study included 43 patients, presented by malignant obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatobiliary cancer. They were divided into two groups: group I (20 patients) underwent palliative biliary-enteric surgical bypass; group II (23 patients) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and metal stent drainage. Results This study showed that both surgical bypass and EMS insertion have similar short-term satisfactory results in the control of jaundice. Surgical bypass had low incidence rate as regards late complications, although gastric outlet obstruction may occur for patients without gastric bypass. Despite EMS resulted in a shorter hospital stay, the higher late complications rate raised the cost, especially stent occlusion. Conclusion Endoscopic EMS and surgical bypass had similar results according to the efficacy of biliary drainage and mean survival period. EMS had a shorter hospital stay and fewer early complications. But, in the long run, surgical bypass results in less recurrent jaundice than the EMS but higher morbidity and mortality.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed187    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal