• Users Online: 514
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ERRATUM
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 421

Erratum: Prophylaxis or treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery: phenylephrine versus norepinephrine boluses


Date of Web Publication14-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1687-1693.278396

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Prophylaxis or treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery: phenylephrine versus norepinephrine boluses. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2019;17:421

How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Prophylaxis or treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery: phenylephrine versus norepinephrine boluses. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 29];17:421. Available from: http://www.azmj.eg.net/text.asp?2019/17/4/421/278396



In the article titled “Prophylaxis or treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery: phenylephrine versus norepinephrine boluses”, published on pages 27-32, Issue 1, Volume 16 in Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal[1], the term “systolic blood pressure (SBP)” was misspelled as “mean arterial pressure (MAP)” in below mentioned areas:

On page 27, abstract section, under heading Patients and methods, 3rd paragraph, 4th line.

The correct statement should be read as “According to the percentage degree of fall of systolic blood pressure (SBP) after spinal block, 100 full-term pregnant female patients were classified into either

prophylaxis groups: received intravenous bolus of either PE 100 µg (group I) or NE 8 µg (group II) when systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell between 100 and 80% of baseline, or treatment groups: received same bolus of PE (group III) or NE (group VI) when SBP fell below 80% of baseline.”

On page 28, under heading Prophylaxis groups (52 patients), 1st and 2nd paragraph, 2nd line respectively.

The correct statement should be read as

“(1) Group I (GI; 26 patients): prophylactic intravenous bolus of PE 100 μg when SBP fell between 100 and 80% of baseline (PE prophylaxis).

(2) Group II (GII; 26 patients): prophylactic intravenous bolus of NE 8 μg when SBP fell between 100 and 80% of baseline (NE prophylaxis).”

On page 28, under heading Treatment groups (48 patients), 1st and 2nd paragraph, 2nd line respectively.

The correct statement should be read as

“(1) Group III (GIII; 24 patients): intravenous bolus of PE 100 μg when SBP fell below 80% of baseline (PE treatment).

(2) Group IV (GIV; 24 patients): intravenous bolus of NE 8 μg when SBP fell below 80% of baseline(NE treatment).”



 
  References Top

1.
Abdelmaboud MA, Seyam SH, Salem EA. Prophylaxis or treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery: phenylephrine versus norepinephrine boluses. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2018; 16:27–32  Back to cited text no. 1
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed225    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded32    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]